Layout:
Home > Cost Effectiveness

Cost Effectiveness

November 1st, 2006 at 12:51 am

Well, today was not a no-spend day, but that was by design. After 3pm on Halloween, the candy starts getting marked down, so that's when I stock up.

But I did some additionally shopping while I was out. I broke the handle on my laundry hamper this morning, and decided it was time to replace it. Well, I actually replaced it with two laundry baskets - a standard one for my sons' room (which is just across the hall from the laundry room) and a hip-hugger model for the upstairs bedrooms. I figured that if I'm going to be lugging laundry up and down the stairs, I may as well do it comfort.

So I spend about $15 for both, which got me thinking about cost effectiveness. The broken hamper was a Rubbermaid (shades of a recent forum thread) that was over 15 years old. I think I got my money's worth! Smile

If I get the same wear out of my new (Rubbermaid, naturally) laundry baskets, they will cost me about $1 per year. Sure, I could have saved a couple of dollars by going with a cheaper brand, but I figured I'd splurge on reliability.

1 Responses to “Cost Effectiveness”

  1. tinapbeana Says:
    1162355648

    such a fan of the cost per year method! quality things may cost a bit more but they will almost always last longer and therefore cost less to own in the long run. plus, you're time to replace the cheap alternatives has to be worth a little something!

Leave a Reply

(Note: If you were logged in, we could automatically fill in these fields for you.)
*
Will not be published.
   

* Please spell out the number 4.  [ Why? ]

vB Code: You can use these tags: [b] [i] [u] [url] [email]